Peter Donald wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 20:09, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > can someone give me a hint on what's the procedure to release a > > subproject? Is a vote necessary? > > There is no real formal process for release. Usually it is lazy > consensus for > components that are already released so just state intentions and unless > anyone objects go for it. > Ok, but what does 'go for it' mean? Where do I put the dists, do we have bin and src dists etc. Or is this a matter of the subproject as well?
> However we require a vote to go for a component to move from > alpha to released > which I believe those components are doing? ANyways I would be +1 for > promoting xmlutil and sourceresolve (don't use store). Ok, yes, that's right. I will start a vote then. > One thing > I would like > to see is for sourceresolve to be upgraded so that components do not > implement Component interface however that requires changes to cocoon > presumably ... > Hmm, the only problem is the release() method of the component manager, were we would have to cast to Component for these components - this would not be an incompatible change as we did not release Cocoon with the sourceresolve package, but it's inconsistent - there are components were you have to cast and 95% you don't have to. What do others thing on this? Carsten -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
