> From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2002 18:35, Leo Simons wrote: > > agreed. However, defining a container API that allows > plugging of any > > facility using an event- or pipeline- like architecture > seems a nice > > idea, and the current work to enable this is definately > moving in the > > right direction. > > I remember quite a few people remarking how Component marker > interface was a > good idea, or ComponentSelector was a great idea, or that all > the Poolable, > Threadsafe etc interfaces were good ideas. Is this idea good > in the same way? > I think a little wider testing is needed before you could adopt it.
Uh, Component was legacy, from before either of us started using Avalon. Poolable was your interface if I am not mistaken? I personally didn't care one way or the other until it caused problems and I had to create my own pooling code. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
