Paul Hammant wrote:
> Nicola,
>
>>> And it is great. Are you going to take back your words-in-my-mouth
>>> "Phoenix == Avalon RI" jibe?
>>
>>
>> Are you going to take away the "Phoenix BlockContext == de-facto
>> standard"?
>> No, because in a sense both of us are right.
>
>
> No. I did not claim Avalon RI was Phoenix. You said I did.
Ok, I misunderstood your question.
I mean this:
You never claimed that Avalon RI was Phoenix.
I did.
I never said that Phoenix BlockContext == de-facto standard".
You did.
Happy?
Has this gotten us some progress?
Gee, I get more done in the discussion with Peter than with you, loosen
up, man!
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
