Berin Loritsch wrote:
>I believe that the ComponentVerifier would be even more useful if you
>gave it a Type object, and a Class object and let the thing do its
>verifications from there.
>
>That way we don't have to repeat that logic in several places.
>
Agreed - I think what is needed is an explicit TypeVerified that handles
the lever-level component verification together with model to coomponent
implemetation class verfication.
Steve.
>
>
>"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
> deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> - Benjamin Franklin
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
