Leo Sutic wrote:
>Realized that I made the method public by mistake.
>
> /**
> * Method to assume ownership of one of the managers the
> * <code>ContextManager</code> created. Ownership means that the
> * <code>ContextManager</code> is responsible for destroying the
> * manager when the <code>ContextManager</code> is destroyed.
> *
>
>
>>>> * FIXME: Should this really be public? Also, we should throw a
>>>> * NullPointerException instead.
>>>>
>>>>
> *
> * @param object The object being claimed
> *
> * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the object is null.
> */
> public void assumeOwnership( Object o )
>
>Ooops. Not supposed to be public - supposed to be private.
>
>Do we just change it (any code using it deserves to get broken)
>or leave it?
>
>+1 for changing access modifier to private.
>
>
+1
Fortress has not gone through a formal realease and the status is well
documented on the home page:
" This package is under development, and the API is not guaranteed
to be the same when it is ready for release. You can find this in the
excalibur-fortress-1.0.jar file if you want to play with it. Do not
blame
us if the next release of Excalibur breaks your code if you use this
package."
Cheers, Steve.
>/LS
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
