> From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 00:24, Leo Sutic wrote:
> > In short: Peter - just do what feels right. This is like the
> > whitespace style of your code (brace on same or following
> line?), and
> > we can expend a metric shitload of time arguing back and forth with
> > very little of actual value coming out of it.
>
> ahh - okay ;)
>
> I am using Davids suggestion and it seems to work reasonably
> well. In database
> terms it boils down to;
> * normalize data
> * keys (or candidate keys) become attributes
> * repeating groups become elements
> * remaining data items become either elements (if long),
> attributes (if
> "salient") or I flip a coin if no other rule holds ;)
Sounds OK. If possible - could you make it so that the resulting
structure can be made into a Configuration? I.e. no mixed content.
/LS
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
