On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 18:26, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > I have seen interceptors being used, and I also have seen many > implementations as hacks.
This one wont be ;) It already looks sweet. > You cannot easily control what happens when you put various layers of > interception in your calls, and it can lead to lack of control. Err - interceptors are about giving you very very explicit fine grain control. I am not sure what you mean by this ... > The point is: what does interception give us that lifecycle extension > cannot? pooling, persistence, security, transactions, auditing, etc. All transparently and for free. There is a reason that all major enterprise frameworks offer someway to do just this. > Lifecycle is the *key* to Avalon use and comprehension, and it has > remained solid in time, where other features have not always. exactly. -- Cheers, Peter Donald ---------------------------------------- Why does everyone always overgeneralize? ---------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
