> I think a sensible approach is to do what Linux Kernel development does. > It branches the development into a Stable branch and a Development > branch. The truth is we need a *stable* Phoenix.
Which is what I would propose....but I am afraid that the people most active on phoenix maintainance (ie pete, paul, ....) would just leave the stable branch lying around, being stable. The linux kernel team has more resources. Maintaining branches is a resource commitment. I'm not going to ask it of the phoenix people. but it'd be smart =) - Leo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
