Leo Sutic wrote:
> Berin,
>
> regarding delegates.
>
> 1) I want them too.
>
> 2) They are cool.
>
> 3) Events are cool too.
>
> 4) They don't belong in Excalibur/Util, because they are more than just
> utilities for Excalibur.
>
> 5) They don't belong in Excalibur, because Excalibur is supposed to
> be Avalon-specific. (That's why we're throwing out Collections).
>
> 6) They don't belong in Framework.
>
> 7) They are really language-level constructs.
>
> Therefore I suggest we try to get them into Commons/Lang.
Your version would make it. I am using Excalibur as a scratchpad
in this case.
> I think it is OK for Excalibur to have dependencies on Commons,
> plus having them there will increase the likelyhood of adoption.
>
> Opinion?
True. However in order for it to be in Lang, it cannot be in its
current form. I will try adapting it to your form (the factory
pattern).
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
