On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 09:25, Peter Donald wrote: > On Fri, 4 Oct 2002 13:07, Berin Loritsch wrote: > > Peter, it seems that this might really help out with the Interceptor stuff. > > For instance, you can have a set of static methods that hold all the logic > > for your interceptors, and then invoke them with the Delegate to the > > correct method. It is faster than giant switch/if/then/else networks, and > > takes up less space than several small classes in the JAR. > > Kool - I will check it out. However I still can't get interceptor performance > to an acceptable level so it looks like BCEL is going to have to be the > answer.
hmm. Does that imply you consider all existing architectures that use interceptors to provide 'unacceptable' bad performance (I think the vast majority of code doesn't resort to BCEL ;)? What kind of performance are you shooting at? Would BCEL make it more complex to write an interceptor? Would it make it more complex to write a container using the interceptor toolkit? just interested.... - Leo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
