I don't realy understand the licence stuff. But if it helps i can implement the ServiceMBean and MBeanRegistration instead of subclassing ServiceMBeanSupport. Form a technical point of view this is a bit crazy. But maybe then i become a simple user of the Jboss stuff ?
>> Actually upon closer inspection it extends JBoss classes.. from a >> license standpoint can we have code that subclasses LGPL under APL? >Hmmm .. nope. They would be considered extensions of LGPL work rather than >users of LGPL work which means we can't host em ;( -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
