On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 13:18, Berin Loritsch wrote: > > From: Peter Donald [mailto:peter@;apache.org] > > > > Hi, > > > > Theres a few anomalies in Fortress that I would like to > > change but they will > > break backwards compatability - so I guess I want to see if > > anyone objects. > > > > The Container work interface extends ContainerConstants which > > is something we > > have discussed in the past and decided is a bad pattern that > > can lead to > > abuse. > > Yep, separate them.
done. > > The other problem is that the Container work interface > > extends Initializable > > and Disposable where generally we try to separate lifecycle and work > > interfaces. > > > > The question is - do we fix them and break backwards > > compatability or do we > > leave them as is? > > It has not been released yet. I have been sidetracked getting > used to a new job. kool ;) Do you think it will be released in the near future. I was planning on adopting it for a project starting in about three weeks and if there was a release by then ... well that would be great ;) -- Cheers, Peter Donald ------------------------------------------------------------ militant agnostic: i don't know, and you don't know either. ------------------------------------------------------------ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
