On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 22:21, Leo Simons wrote: > +1 to removing "synchronized" from the method signatures of all avalon > framework lifecycle interfaces, except for the ones dealing with > logging. I think there's one or two in that package that are there for a > reason (top-of-head stuff).
no idea where you are talking about - can you point to example? However the whole idea is that the container will only ever enter the component once at any one time via a lifecycle interface. So synchronized is redundent in this case > > cheers, > > - Leo > > On Sat, 2002-11-09 at 04:11, Peter Donald wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Does anyone object to the complete removal of synchronization from the > > lifecycle methods. I just noticed some code that synchronizes > > initialize() which seemd wrong. > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > > > Peter Donald -- Cheers, Peter Donald *--------------------------------* | Every rule has an exception, | | except the rule of exceptions. | *--------------------------------* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
