Stephen McConnell wrote:
I thought there was a discussion going on about what should be avalon pmc responability and waht not. If so the options are:Stephen McConnell wrote:Federico Barbieri wrote:I would list each project that will be the initial foundation. fede
Fede :
Could you repost you question under a different thread.
I think discussion on things like charter, reorganization et. are healthy but its not part of the vote thread.
Woops - I posted a request and redirected the thread as well which was a little inconsistent of me.
I suggest we continue on this thread.
Let me start of with a rsponse which is based on the resolution currently under a vote:
* Avalon is the content currently assigned under the Jakarta Apache
Project Avalon sub-project
- the framework
- logkit
- excalibur
- pheonix
- avalon-apps
- cornerstone
* The proposed resolution calls for migration of this content and
rationalization.
There has already been discussion on this - mainly different throughts on the approach. But it is safe to say that the disucssion hasn't gone very deep at this stage. Cheers, Steve.
A - to found the PMC you need to sign a liability form:
1 - you know which project will be avalon pmc and which commons or incubator *or*
2 - you sign for all avalon related projects. When you have a better picture of the organization you update the form as common and/or incubator takes resposability for what's moved there
B - you may have a PMC without signing anything so you can take your time to decide things and sign later.
I don't know if there is a choice between A and B. That was my only concern. Do you have details on this?
fede
Cheers, Steve.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
