Re: Avalon Project Hierarchy

[Nicola Ken Barozzi]

Paul Hammant wrote:

-1 (vote) for me.

This is too much revolution when code is being used by real people in real companies...

* framework is already there
* components is already there, and it's called Cornerstone
* scratchpad has nothing to do with production code
* phoenix is still there

The only thing that could change is the placement of Excalibur stuff in Commons, avalon-components or scratchpad.

What revolution are you talking about?

I also object to the word "new" in any product name. I also object to the word "stable" in product
names.

Call it ZContainer or something...

Paul, are you being serious?!?

- Paul

--- Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Nicola Ken Barozzi:

So we will have

 * avalon-framework
 * avalon-components
 * avalon-scratchpad
 * avalon-phoenix
 * avalon-newstablecontainer

+1 for this and all the implications mentioned in the mail
as well (I don't want to include all of the mail here only
to say, I agree).

Carsten

--
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            - verba volant, scripta manent -
   (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>