Peter Donald wrote:
Sure - one container would be nice. It is not like it has not been attempted before in the past. Maybe some history is in order.[snip]
I'm sorry but in what you write I really fail to see any technical reasons why there couldn't be one Avalon Framework implementation that serves everybody's needs.
The only reason I see is human: people even *disagree* on *what* an avalon framework implementation (aka container) is.
I suggest that we start from there.
--
Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
