On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:29, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > That's why I started the info-meta merge discussion, and see clazz as a > good solution.
Clazz is far from good for our purposes because it also tries to be a reflection based mechanism. We need to load things without classes being resolvable and so forth. The commons-attribute codebase (or whatever it was) is a better solution but not perfect (too many dependencies, too hard to use, etc). However currently XDoclet is finally starting to go towards XDoclet2. They look like they are going to integrate with qdox peeps and produce a runtime attribute retrieval in conjunction with some commons people. I would prefer to wait to see what the XDoclet/qdox/commons teams produce. If it does not suit us then we can create our own (I already did most of it with MetaClass codebase and another guy Doug has taken up development of it). -- Cheers, Peter Donald ------------------------------------------------ | We shall not cease from exploration, and the | | end of all our exploring will be to arrive | | where we started and know the place for the | | first time -- T.S. Eliot | ------------------------------------------------ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
