> > How do you percieve Phoenix's place in Avalon?
>
> The only released container that uses practices we still approve of.
There are
> several things that suck about Phoenix but overall it is not too bad. The
> parts that suck can almost all be replaced in a backwards compatible manner
> (with the exception of isolation requirements). In the end it is a good
tool
> to get more people involved in Avalon.
That's not quite a complete answer, possible owing to an incomplete
question.
Specifically, how to you expect Phoenix's future evolution to be?
Your statement is basically about things that have happened, and an
assessment of how it is now. But it is lacking some statements about
where you are going, as a project within Avalon.
I'm not interested in the technical parts (interceptors). But more how
Phoenix's relation to Avalon in general will evolve.
/LS
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- RE: Phoenix no longer referenc... Berin Loritsch
- Re: Phoenix no longer referenc... Stefano Mazzocchi
- Re: Phoenix no longer referenc... Stephen McConnell
- Re: Phoenix no longer referenc... Stefano Mazzocchi
- Re: Phoenix no longer referenc... Peter Donald
- Re: Phoenix no longer referenc... Neeme Praks
- Re: Phoenix no longer referenc... Peter Donald
- Re: Phoenix no longer referenc... Stefano Mazzocchi
- RE: Phoenix no longer referenc... Berin Loritsch
- RE: Phoenix no longer reference container Berin Loritsch
- Re: Phoenix no longer reference container Leo Sutic
- Re: Phoenix no longer reference container Stefano Mazzocchi
- RE: Phoenix no longer reference container Noel J. Bergman
- Re: Phoenix no longer reference container Giacomo Pati
