Peter Donald wrote:
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002 16:08, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:

what are you talking about? Cocoon uses ECM which, the name "extensible
component manager" suggests,

Actually it is named "Excalibur Component Manager".
Sorry, my fault. But if Cocoon uses something that is stored inside Avalon CVS and it's called 'Excalibur Component Manager' and the Avalon community has control on it, where is the fork?

was the simplest embeddable avalon component manager around when Cocoon
needed one.

It was specially crafted for Cocoon because the existing container was not suitable.
Interesting vision: when the community decides to go the way you propose, the community creates consensus, when the community goes another direction, this is 'forking' or 'special crafting'.

Tell me: if you started using Cocoon and you need a new feature and proposed it on the community and the community voted it in. Would you call it 'special crafting'?

Cocoon never imposed anything on this project: we asked for features and they were implemented thru a consensus-based development model.

But since this consensus came out with something you didn't like, you keep bashing around. What a lovely attitude to earn respect.

--
Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to