Leo Simons wrote:

On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 12:33, Stephen McConnell wrote:

Leo:

I understand and support the principal you are putting forward in you email.

all I want, really :)


I don't support the approach.

Following the transition there was a lot of discussion about reorganization - to-date only a small number of the issues have been addressed - there are things that need to be done. Instead of padding the cells with cotton-wool, isn't it a better idea to pull together some level of position - identification of issue/actions, etc. Keep things under [PROPOSAL] state being maybe a little more formal

how about informal but distinctive ;)

It works for me.


about distinguishing between discussion versus decision - where discussion is done to death - and theres consensus - we can move forward with a [VOTE] - where the discussion is problematic - lets a least get to the point of knowing this.

okay.


One more point - avalon-sandpad.

sandbox ;)

:-)


I do not agree that this is the dumping ground for contentious code.
It was my understanding that this is the area for non-released code, experiments, and evolving content. I don't think we should change that.

agreed. However, the things I think that are currently contentious are
unreleased evolving experiments :D

also, what I think is that we should make sure that

ContentiousCode extends UnreleasedCode {}

I don't really follow the extension logic here - but aside from that I think I disagree with the implications.

;-)

If something is released it's non-contentious.
If something is not released - then its sandbox - and its auto contentious because it hasn't been through a release process. Contentious or otherwise is a very subjective thing - I don't think anything I am working on is contentious, but I know some people think otherwise. That's why we delineate things through a release process is important.

Cheers, Steve.


cheers,

- Leo



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




--

Stephen J. McConnell

OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to