Stephen McConnell wrote:
>
> Seems we have gump problems and the gump file seems to have been
> moved out of Excalibur root - does anyone know where it is and who
> has karma. Roy, there is a rumour that your physically representative
> of the gump community - any info here - can we get the gump
> descriptor for excalibur back into Excalibur root?
Further background: the gump files were originally developed as a
proposal in alexandria. In response to user requests, I added support
for projects to move such descriptions out to their own repositories.
The avalon ones were moved out, presumably in the hopes that they would
obtain a greater sense of ownership and be more actively maintained in
their new location.
This did not prove to be the case. All that occurred was that the
people who were actually interested in maintaining these descriptors no
longer had access.
I was pleased to see these descriptors moved back.
Now let me describe how the community model for gump works. If you are
capable of doing a cvs checkout, building the "gen" target of the
project (a process that takes approximately 30 seconds, and only
requires Ant and a JAXP 1.1 compliant parser), are a committer on an
Apache project, and express an interest in maintaining one or more
descriptors, then you are voted in.
More information can be found at:
http://jakarta.apache.org/gump/usage.html .
Note: the reason for the "ability to build the gen target" is that we
were receiving patches that weren't even well formed XML.
- Sam Ruby
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Gump - where are you ? Stephen McConnell
- Re: Gump - where are you ? Nicola Ken Barozzi
- Re: Gump - where are you ? Stephen McConnell
- RE: Gump - where are you ? Berin Loritsch
- JMX Scott Tavares
- Re: JMX Peter Donald
- Sam Ruby
