> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Leo, > > I saw Pete's comments. I, personally, don't agree with him > and I didn't see > him veto the approach, hence my summary.
Noel, there are other usage issues that come into play with the Context object. I think our time will be best served by determining if we are focusing on Avalon 5 contracts for future development or an Avalon 4.2 (same as current framework interfaces but with additional contracts). The bottom line is that the whole Context concept might come under fire--esp. since it is highly domain specific. We might need a new mechanism to provide pluggable context types. In that case, each context type would determine if it uses the proposed URNs or not. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
