[Preface: just a few nits, and a couple of questions regarding the ASF Bylaws vs the PMC charter]
> " It is also possible for a project depending on Avalon to nominate > a representative. The representative of the client project still > needs to be unanimously approved by all PMC members, and a two-thirds > majority vote of committers. " I think that you can (and should) remove the word "still". And change "representative of the client project" to "the client project's representative." Nit-picking, I know. Also, please review section 6.4 of the Apache Bylaws. It states that the members of the PMC are appointed by the ASF Board (or a designated member). IANAL, so I'm not sure how to interpret that clause vis-a-vis the PMC charter. > ... direction of the newly-formed Apache Software Foundation ... Is the "newly-formed" adjective still appropriate? > The PMC must have at least one officer from the Apache Board, > who will be the Chairperson and report to the Apache Board. That is from the ASF Bylaws, section 6.3. Is the ASF Board really going to put a board member on each PMC as Chairman? The current board is posted here: http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/. I'll point out that Nicola is neither a board member, nor an ASF member. Again, I'm just trying to understand this with respect to the ASF Bylaws, since I expect to be going through this again shortly with James. Perhaps Sam Ruby or Greg Stein can help clear up my confusion, since they are presently reading this list. > (I would [commit] it, but I am behind a corporate firewall). Is SSH unable to penetrate your corporate firewall? --- Noel -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
