On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 20:08, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > I assume there will be multiple proposals going on > > in which case we can get things like; > > proposals/red > > proposals/blue > > proposals/green > > when one of them looks like it is a winner and has enough > > momentum split off a new CVS then. > > I've read Rules for Revolutionaries, too. But isn't the entire point of > this exercise to move forward with ONE voice? I don't believe that > institutionalizing factions is the best way to address that issue.
How can you vote on something uness you see it in action. Separate trees only become a problem when there is chest thumpers and code ownership galore. Given that the problem behaviour is unlikely to be attempted again - or at least while there are upper managament about ;) then I don't think there will be a problem. A little story; When I first got here I liked ComponentManagers simplicity and design. Berin advocated JNDI to access services/context data. Then one week he finally convinced me that JNDI was was better - funny thing was I had convinced him that CM was better - so we "swapped" proposals. Then a few weeks later we swapped again (ie I was +1 for CM he was +1 for JNDI). At no stage did we have any problems with the different proposals. -- Cheers, Peter Donald ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | I thought there was a knob on the TV to turn up the intelligence. | | There's a knob called "brightness", but it doesn't work. | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
