> > 1) Minimum period within which to count votes [1 week]
Please note that my [1 week] was a shorthand for what I saw as the
suggestion from Berin, not my own. Although I think that a week is a
reasonable value.
> Berin mentioned extension of the period if quorum has not been met.
> If such a notion is introduced we must also have a cut-off point
> where a motion fails because quorum was not met (e.g. three weeks).
> I would also be happy with no extension semantics.
Either one works for me.
> > 2) The definition of a quorum (3+, 33%, 50%) [ ? ]
> This one (for me) is strong influenced by two factors
I think that it makes sense that if the idea of elections is dropped in
favor of allowing any active and interested Committer to be a PMC member,
you might incorporate your notion of a Committer having to ask to be on the
PMC, and having to renew the request per period (6 months to a year).
Given that, you should have an engaged PMC, and should be able to stick with
the 50% quorum. If someone else wants a lower standard, let them propose
it.
> > 3) Percentage required to carry the vote [ 66% ]
Again, the 66% was my shorthand for Berin's apparent suggestion. I'd go
with a simple majority (and a 50% quorum).
--- Noel
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
