Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I'm not saying that Avalon must not have a charter.warning: FUD-remark.
I'm saying "let's write the most simply charter than can possibly mean something", nothing more.
Given the recent tension inside Avalon, I dare to question the necessity to toplevel ATM. Avalon might receive an amount of exposure the community can't currently cope with...?
Just an outsider idea, throw away if it's not valid.
</Steven>
--
Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at http://radio.weblogs.com/0103539/
stevenn at outerthought.org stevenn at apache.org
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
