On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 19:11, Neeme Praks wrote: > When implementing dynamic proxies for JDK 1.2, we have two choices: > 1. I have cooked up an implementation for generating dynamic proxy > classes with BCEL, but it still needs some more work to make it ready > for production use.
I would prefer this because I assume it is small and lightweight and does not have any overhead but poking through CGLIB looks like it does. However it is up to you. If you don't want to support the code or can't get it into BCEL or whatever then CGILIB may be an option. However if we go that path I would prefer that CGILIB only got used under jdk1.2 and native proxys got used in jdk1.3+ > Was it really part of Jakarta Commons? I think so (at least it has the same authors). > Why did it leave? good question. > I would really like to have that project under Apache umbrella, under > BCEL or whereever. BCEL doesn't seem to have much of community so it > would make sense to move it there, to increase the community (there are > currently 4 developers working on CGLIB) and provide some useful > implementations on top of BCEL... Or am I just dreaming here...? BCEL doesn't have a community and never has (even pre-Apache days). It came to Apache ready made and of high enough quality that no one really needs to change it much. Theres a lot of users but thats about it. -- Cheers, Peter Donald --------------------------------------------------- Murphy's law - "Anything that can go wrong, will." (Actually, this is Finagle's law, which in itself shows that Finagle was right.) --------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
