In Fortress? I think it was me and I asked this list if there was any problems but no one spoke up.
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 05:26, Berin Loritsch wrote: > Somebody made some *major* changes to the RoleManager interface, > and I do not recall any conversations/explanations regarding it. > > The problem is that I *specifically* designed the RoleManager > to support both forwards and backwards interpretation of a > component's entry in the configuration. My intent was that in > the future, the configuration file would be "self-healing". > If there was an entry in the configuration file that was with > the old "<component/>" format and there was an entry for it > in the RoleManager, then the Container would be able to write > the configuration file back with the human readable form of > the name. > > The new implementations and interface does not allow for this > type of action, and in fact it prevents it from ever happening > in the future. Also, the replacement did not meet the Java > API documentation standards as the original version did. > > I am going to revert the changes *back* to the way they were. > If there are any serious objections (which I doubt), please > voice them now. -- Cheers, Peter Donald "Man's mind stretched to a new idea never goes back to its original dimensions." -Oliver Wendell Holmes -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
