Sam Ruby wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Gump should have warned us before, but it has not been working
for too much time. We have to fix it. Sam is helping everybody
to get back to making Gump build everything
Sam is working hard, but one problem is that if GUMP can't successfully
build a dependency, then it can hardly report when that dependency
changes
in such manner that when it finally builds it will break dependents.
Getting the system to cleanly build is hard, and a number of us are
working on it (I won't take full credit).
Keeping the system cleanly building takes cooperation. What it means
is that people don't keep components failing for weeks on end. You've
known about incompatibilities, but you have not chosen to address
them. This is not a big deal as other projects aren't depending on
you, but is a big deal in other cases.
Leo Simons hit the nail on the head when he said "Let's try and stop
being the gump problem child, shall we?".
It is my opinion that the Avalon team is now sufficiently motivated to
try to keep their components building under Gump.
Yep .. count on it.
Cheers, Steve.
--
Stephen J. McConnell
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
