Leo Sutic wrote:
I'm holding off a bit waiting for comments from Berin / Leo Simons / anyone else.That's cool - I have to confess that the repeated "[Waiting a bit with this one. See below.]" had me ROTFL - but yes, Leo & Berin's feedback is needed before rolling anything out.
Basically, your changes that fix mistakes and the ones that were
related to the points I listed are fine. The changes that are
merely stylistic I'd like to hold back for a little while - I
don't want us to try to find the most beautiful text for this
proposal. That said, I think at least some of your changes do
clean things up.
Concerning the subject of quorum - if you go back to the current procedures - it is the quorum value that qualifies the voting process relative to the types of votes the the PMC get get into - normal vote: quorum = 1/2, P&P vote: quorum = 2/3. If you fail to reach quorum - the vote is not a vote - its not a yes, not a no, it just isn't.
Cheers, Steve.
--
Stephen J. McConnell
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
