> From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Are you saying that you have a Component that implements the > "Containment" pattern (as I dubbed it), meaning that you have > developed a component that also happens to be a container?
I have though about this, and basically come up with one little issue: We have so far assumed that service dependencies can be declared at a Type level - i.e. it is a property of the component itself, and not something that is configurable. However, if the component is a container, the sub-components inside it may have dependencies that cannot be satisfied by sub-components but must be provided to the container-component by its container. This use case, where the dependencies of a component is determined by the components inside it, isn't accounted for. One solution is to subclass the container class and add deps to the subclass. /LS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
