At 08:43 3/4/01 +0200, Leo Simons wrote: ><snipped> >> To that end, I propose the following heirarchy: >> >> org.apache.avalon (stable subpackages and interfaces, etc.) >> >> org.apache.avalon.untested (packages and classes, etc under development) > >This seems the better solution from a marketing POV. Also, it >removes some duplicity in naming (when accessing cvs, new users >might think "framework? I thought Avalon was the framework". I >just saw an existing user think that =). > >Perhaps it shouldn't be "untested" but "alpha" or >"development". Doesn't matter that much. My +1.
I would prefer a whole other name/brand for that ... org.apache.???.* Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
