At 12:20 12/5/01 +0200, Leo Simons wrote: >> BTW - I also re-read the main docs again and a whole bunch of >> references to >> "server" have popped in again ... which I thought I deleted a >> while back ;) > >I actually removed a lot of those (not all) during my sweep >through the docs. Sure you actually committed those changes?
looks like I didn't - damn !!! not sure what happened ;/ >> As for what to do next - I would like to do the framework >> javadocs. I would >> prefer it if someone else was to write a basic how-to for the framework >> section ;) > >I will tackle that _if_ I can find the time (I wrote half of it >when my comp crashed, last time). grooovy !!! ;) >> I will also try to correct any inconsistencies in the existing >> high-level design orientated docs. > >lifecycle.xml still refers to Executable and Interruptable - >should be an easy fix. done. >Other than that, Excalibur really needs >documentation badly. Would it be better that instead of describing each component individually we point them to package.html for each package??? We could then just have a short highlevel description in xdocs which points to package.html for further data??? Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
