At 03:28 PM 6/13/01 -0400, Berin Loritsch wrote: >The first thing you notice is the stark shallow-chromatic-ness of the logo. >In other words, it looks as if it were designed solely for monochrome printers. >This is in distinct contrast to the previous logo that we had. It was nice >looking, colorful, and it printed well. > >I think that with the subtle use of shadows we can achieve this again--still >using our current design. Check out the logos of some of the other Jakarta >packages (I enclosed what I think are the best of the crop). All of them >have a certain level of dimension. Whether the dimension is created by >color variations (i.e. tomcat), or by shadows (i.e. jetspeed) they all lend >a visual interest that our logo doesn't grab.
Damn - I like the logo we have now. It could use some color though. ;) Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
