Paul Hammant wrote: > You've beaten it already then I think. Start by having a look > HelloWorldServer or some of the others. Wehn starting new blocks, I > invariable clone one of these and make it what I want (iteratively). > > "top-level object graph" Not sure what you mean here.
Just mean that when we start up the server framework we create a single Kernel instance, hand it a configuration location, and let 'er rip. Top level would be the kernel instance that contains everything else. In theory the juggernaut stuff can have many Kernels in a VM, but we've never had a reason to do it. > The only static in Avalon will be genuine factories. Cool. > >Worse case, we can use our existing configuration framework, which is > You're saying what we've done (or not done) is the worst case scenarios > for you? Perhaps then suggest and interface that could touch on what > you need :-) Actually, by worst case, I meant that if we ultimately decide that it would be too much of a pain to immediately convert things over to the Avalon configuration system, we could keep our own. -- Tom Bradford The dbXML Group, L.L.C. http://www.dbxmlgroup.com/ Desktop, Laptop, Settop, Palmtop. Can your XML database do that? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
