On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 07:25, Paul Hammant wrote: > >So my question is should we require that services extend service. I can > > make it required or maybe just sternly warn when Service interfaces are > > non-compliant or we can deprecate the interface altogether. > > Change ... services no longer needing to extend Service : > > +1
kool. So do we deprecate the Service interface aswell? > Would they still requite a member variable called ROLE ? Naah - thats just a nice convention ;) > This would be cool as it would allow us (me) to blockify third party > appications more easily. That is, provided they have seperated into > interface/implementation. woohoo. -- Cheers, Pete ----------------------------------------------- "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." -Albert Einstein ----------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
