SAR-INF/lib/myBlockArchive.jar SAR-INF/lib/mySupport.jar SAR-INF/server.xml SAR-INF/config.xml SAR-INF/assembly.xml data/my-random-datafile.txt
I think above layout is good. because web.xml is placed in WEB-INF. And extract server.xml, config.xml, assembly.xml. before we have configuration templating mechanism.
I agree. Looks clean and consistent.
It is clean & consistent, but :
WAR files are about web-content. As such all that's at the root level of the archive (HTML, JSP, GIF etc) can be said to be the primary content. Stuff in WEB-INF/classes and WEB-INF/lib can be said to be support. I.e. they are given a namespace (WEB-INF/*) that is unlikely to be required in the directory structure of the primary content.
I don't think Phoenix server apps are that category of thing. If I agree with SAR-INF at all it's to replace the "conf" dir and no more. That is, unless someone can come up with an example of a SAR files that would need the root namespace to the same level as WAR files do.
Exec summary : Paul votes -1
Regards,
- Paul H
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
