On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 07:46, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> I updated the Loggable proposal. This provides a smooth upgrade to the
> new Logger interface instead of the LogKit Logger implementation.
By smooth you mean non backwards compayible and will break your existings
systems ? ;)
I am fairly anti such a move. I would much much much prefer something like
the following. This is binary compatible and will not force me to go through
and change oodles of stuff.
interface LogAware
{
void enableLogging( Logger );
}
class abstract AbstractLogAware implements LogAware {}
I really don't think we should be breaking binary compatability in such a
fundamental interface in a supposedly stable library.
> The AbstractLogger will perform the wrapping for you.
>
> Let me know what you all think, as I want to get this in ASAP!
--
Cheers,
Pete
*------------------------------------------------------*
| Hlade's Law: If you have a difficult task, give it |
| to a lazy person -- they will find an easier |
| way to do it. |
*------------------------------------------------------*
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
