Leo Sutic wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: den 7 november 2001 14:40
> > To: Avalon Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Propagation of LogEnabled
> >
> > As to LogKitManageable,
>
> Berin,
>
> would it be possible to have
<snip/>
> So we don't get Log4JManageable, Log4JManager, and so on...
It would be possible. And if you want to provide the Factories
to control Log4J or JSR47 logging, I am not going to stop you.
I will say that we should always give LogKit better treatment
than the others.
Kind of a value-add thing. "OK, you don't want to use LogKit?
Well you have to configure your Logging implementation yourself
then. Here is how it can hook in..."
I can see where it would be a nice thing to have though.
--
"Those who would trade liberty for
temporary security deserve neither"
- Benjamin Franklin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
