Peter Donald wrote > > I'd be content, in the short term at least, to see more descriptive > > versions of the same thing (i.e. instead of > > <manager-adaptor-port>number</...> to configure the http adaptor, > > <http-adaptor><port>number</port></...>) until JMX configuration is given > > full consideration. > > If you could spec it out fully then I can do that. I just updated the > kernel.xml to show all permutations possible. So if you could show me what > you would change then that would be great.
The MX4J adaptors should probably be marked as MX4J-specific. This seems brief but descriptive: <mx4j-adaptors> <http-adaptor port="8082"/> <jrmp-adaptor/> </mx4j-adaptors> I don't think the fact the the naming factory currently used by default supports RMI is particularly important -- am I wrong? I figure the configuration for naming should be more generic. <naming-factory class="..."/> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
