Hi, Some people have pointed out that cornerstone and some of the apps don't follow what we have recomended as "best-practices" wrt the way define BlockInfo.
Essentially a whole bunch of blocks still define the version="1.0" attribute when it is not required and they also define the <role/> element when it is not required. I started to fix a few instances but if someone could blitz the rest of the codebase and make sure that we don't define anything redundently then that would be fantastic. On Sun, 12 May 2002 12:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT > <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9006>. > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9006 > > Remove version="1.0" from service decl > > Summary: Remove version="1.0" from service decl > Product: Avalon > Version: unspecified > Platform: Other > OS/Version: Other > Status: NEW > Severity: Enhancement > Priority: Other > Component: Cornerstone > AssignedTo: [email protected] > ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Service elements in BlockInfo files do not need to declare that > they are version 1.0 (It is assumed unless otherwise specified). > > Thus we should go through all the apps and make sure that none of the > blockinfos unecessarily declare the version number. -- Cheers, Peter Donald -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
