On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 12:38:23PM +0100, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I use RedHat.  I've tried a few avifile packages and most seem to have a
> lot of issues.
> 
> The one mentioned on the site in particular for redhat 7.2 is built
> against SDL 1.1 while redhat's sdl version in 7.2 is 1.2.
> 
> Since for my project I want to build everything as rpm's, I was wondering
> who is maintaining spec files and if I can be of any assistance ?

Noone is maintaing them - if you want to update them - send me 
a patch file (though I've recived some already today)

Is it possible to use same .spec file for RH7.X ?

> Also, as a second question, will there be a final 0.6.0 version released
> anytime soon ? These cvs snapshots all around are getting on my nerves ;)
> and they're confusing everybody.  Besides that, other projects depending

Not really sure why they should be confusing ?
The finaly 0.6 will not differ from the CVS snapshot  ?

> on avifile are hard to get in sync.  For example, vcr (a console video
> recorder) puts up custom snapshots of avifile on the site.  So I'm just
> asking if a final version is scheduled anytime soon ?

Well final for last week was snapshot from last week :)

As I'm mostly the only one who works on this and many problems takes
apriximately 10times more time to solve than I've supposed - it's
hard to give any dates.

But the interface (though it's being changed - and you haven't seen
my current Write class implementation yet :))  the compilation compatibility
should be preserved  - e.g. there have not been made any change in
the interface without backward compatibility support for few months


-- 
  .''`.  Which fundamental human right do you want to give up today?
 : :' :      Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
 `. `'  Zdenek Kabelac  kabi@{debian.org, users.sf.net, fi.muni.cz}
   `-         Resistance is futile. You all will be packaged

_______________________________________________
Avifile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://prak.org/mailman/listinfo/avifile

Reply via email to