Gotta watch out for these 'redhat' guys, anything but THEIR way = improper. lol
Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > Did you install the rpms? No. That is not properly. > > -ben > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:00:54AM -0500, war wrote: > > I installed it properly. > > Define not installed properly, pal. > > > > Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:04:06AM +0100, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 11:11:27PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > hmm.. don't know if it's the right address but someone had problem with > > > > > it: > > > > > > > > Well it's good address but I'm forwarding this to avifile mailing > > > > list - as there have been recently some discussion about this. > > > > > > > > This seems to be really constructive and you seemed to find something > > > > really important (Mike - what do you think now ? - are you still > > > > 100% sure that RH is innocent here ? ) > > > > > > Most of the people "experiencing" this problem are compiling SDL by > > > themselves and failing to install it properly. Just use the SDL-devel > > > package, it's easier. up2date -i SDL SDL-devel and everything just works > > > properly, otherwise they're probably compiling/linking against different > > > bits of SDL. PEBKAC. > > > > > > -ben > > -- > Fish. _______________________________________________ Avifile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://prak.org/mailman/listinfo/avifile
