Hello Zdenek,

Thursday, January 31, 2002, 11:20:30 AM, you wrote:

>> >> Shouldn't be such a problem caught by configure?
>> 
>> ZK> Well it might be probably checked as a part of SDL - however you would
>> ZK> have to figure out if SDL is compiled with or without -lasound
>> ZK> So I'm not sure if this check belongs to avifile.
>> 
>> As far as I remember, -lasound comes from libSDL.la. I don't
>> understand why test for SDL succeeded for him. Vincenzo, did you use
>> --disable-sdltest?

ZK> But there is just a simple test which doesn't check for any 
ZK> audio capabilities in libsdl and as the function binding is made
ZK> only when the function is really needed (e.g. when libaviplay needs
ZK> some audio functions) the missing -lasound is discovered at this
ZK> time.  As I've said we would have to create more advanced SDL test
ZK> program instead of the simple one which is currently present 
ZK> in avifile.

Ok, on the second thought, missing -lasound will be discovered only when
someone tries to do 'libtool gcc something.o
/usr/local/lib/libSDL.la', and this test is not done by configure.

-- 
Best regards,
 Eugene                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________________
Avifile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://prak.org/mailman/listinfo/avifile

Reply via email to