On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 10:00:30PM +0200, Plamen Dimitrov wrote: > Hi Cleber, > > On 3/2/21 6:36 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 01:30:09PM +0200, Plamen Dimitrov wrote: > >> I am confused about the release process of Avocado VT. First we had an > >> email thread > >> about whether we should provide version tags in sync between Avocado and > >> Avocado VT. > >> We didn't make any final conclusions on what was the final decision there > >> so the release > >> of Avocado VT 83.0 signaled me that we will continue following the > >> previous workflow. > >> Then however, there was never a release for Avocado VT 84.0 which meant we > >> had decided > >> to drop and the conclusion was not to release the VT plugin in sync with > >> the core, the > >> conclusion in the emails remaining unexplained again. Now I see that there > >> is again a > >> tag for Avocado VT 85.0, suggesting that we keep the versions in sync > >> again. > >> > > Yes, you should be confused because I made a mistake and forgot to tag > > and release Avocado-VT 83.0. It was during the holidays, and I got > > cut off during Avocado and Avocado-VT release work. > > I think what you mean to say here is about Avocado VT 84.0. It is also the > missing tag > as I described above with "there was never a release for Avocado VT 84.0". >
Hi Plamen, Yes, sorry, it was about 84.0. Here I made the same mistake wrt version number that I pointed out to your later. > >> Is the missing 83.0 tag an error in the Avocado VT release process? Or is > >> it intentional > >> and there is another decision about the releases many of us are still > >> unaware of? What > >> would you state as a conclusion on the email thread about dropping VT from > >> the Avocado > >> releases? > >> > > I guess you mean 84.0 (83.0 is tagged). So, it was not intentional, it was > > a mistake, > > and the goal is to continue to have releases at the same time. > > Yes, sorry my bad here, I mislead you here which is probably what confused > you above too. > > In any case, I have created an issue at > > https://github.com/avocado-framework/avocado-vt/issues/2937 > > because we need to release in order to be able to release our plugin as well. > More details > described within the issue. > OK, I took care of it (I believe). I don't think we can or should do the release part of it though, because it would bring other types of inconsistencies (for example RPM and git changelog would be out-of-order). > >> Best, > >> Plamen > >> > > Let me know if that answers all of your questions. And I'm sorry > > about the impact this has caused. > > Yes, it makes things clearer. I think additional confusion arose exactly > because we also > discussed whether to drop these tags or not before. > > Thanks for explaining this, > Plamen > Yep, I completely understand why you thought that was the cause. Best! - Cleber.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
