Hi!
You wrote Sunday, January 13, 2008, 1:47:54 AM:
> The table defined above is stored in RAM, not flash (although obviously
> the initialisers are stored in flash), and thus takes up lots of
> valuable ram space. The routines from avrlibc are much more space
> efficient (no tables at all), but are much slower, since they handle a
> single bit at a time. I've included routines below that use 256-entry
> lookup tables in flash,
Thanks a lot, David! Very handy answer!
Best regards,
Kreyl
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 171094105
_______________________________________________
AVR-chat mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-chat
