On Feb 15, 2013, at 7:14 AM, Bob Paddock <[email protected]> wrote:
> Also have never fixed the bugs listed in the errata for the 128A1, > instead they came out with a a different part the 128A1U, which in a > regulatory environment creates a expensive paperwork nightmare if you > want to switch (parts have to be as marked if audited, this is the > Government logic need not apply). So start with the Xmega128A1U in > any new design that you were considering using the 128A1, even if you > don't need USB. That sounds like a good thing to me, not bad. We used to say, "If its documented its not a bug, its a feature." Who is to say the "fix" won't break something that intentionally or accidentally uses the "bug"? Once Upon A Time my brother was very upset at a vendor who did a die shrink without changing the P/N or notifying large volume customers. The new parts did not work in his high noise environment. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [email protected] ============================================================ Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ AVR-chat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-chat
