i am using avr usb programmer avrispmkii.but in avrdude i am getting error
of
 initialization failed, rc=-1 Double check connections and try again, or
use -F to override this check.


On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:30 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Send AVR-chat mailing list submissions to
>         [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-chat
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of AVR-chat digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Any way to friend an interrupt handler? (Rick Mann)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:24:20 -0800
> From: Rick Mann <[email protected]>
> To: David Brown <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [avr-chat] Any way to friend an interrupt handler?
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> On Feb 20, 2013, at 2:08 , David Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Another option that might be usable (depending on how things are split
> > within different modules) is to make the ISR just a wrapper for the
> > "real" code:
> >
> > class x {
> >       friend void ::timerInterrupt(void);
> > private :
> >       int i;
> > };
> >
> > class x the_x;
> >
> > static void timerInterrupt(void) {
> >       the_x.i++;
> > }
> >
> > ISR(TIMER1_OVF_vect) {
> >       timerInterrupt();
> > }
> >
> >
> > With non-negligible optimisations enabled, the static timerInterrupt
> > function will be inlined within the ISR function, so there is no extra
> > overhead.  (Normally there can be significant overhead if an interrupt
> > function calls an external function.)
> >
> > Just a thought for another style.
>
> Yeah, that's how I had been doing it, but I wanted to ensure I didn't have
> the overhead in this case, even when no optimizations were used.
>
> --
> Rick
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> AVR-chat mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-chat
>
>
> End of AVR-chat Digest, Vol 95, Issue 13
> ****************************************
>
_______________________________________________
AVR-chat mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-chat

Reply via email to