Bob von Knobloch <[email protected]> wrote: > While this seems to be 'more correct', it seems a large change from > previous versions.
Actually, GCC not insisting on a flash object being "const" before has been a bug (which simply nobody noticed before). That bug had to be fixed in order for Johann to be able to implement the new __flash named address space. It's an unfortunate side-effect of fixing bugs that the fix sometimes breaks code that used to work in the past. On the pro side, the __flash named address space is something we've not even dared thinking about in GCC some ten years ago. -- cheers, Joerg .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-chat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-chat
