On Monday 30 October 2006 07:29, Bruce D. Lightner wrote: > As it turned out, the size of the AVR interpreter was about the same as > the "p-code" interpreter, about 3K bytes. (Maybe "interpreters" are a > "Zero Sum Game" of some kind?) As for the size of a "p-code" routine > that did more or less the same thing as an "avr-gcc" compiled one, the > p-code had a clear advantage (2-3x), but this varied greatly according > to exactly what was being coded (and who was doing it!).
Perhaps you could use some of the extra space to make a JIT compiler (like HP's Dynamo project http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/1999/HPL-1999-77.pdf) :) -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
pgpvT4TgsVC7s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
